Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

25 Years Ago, John Travolta Starred In One Of The Worst Movies Ever Made






John Travolta is a legend in more than one way. The “Saturday Night Fever” veteran has acted in several incomprehensible classics, but he could also teach the miserable career choices in the master class. The man has been in industry for almost half a century now, and he has never learned to make a bad decision. Since the mid-1970s, since he had a sturdy role in “Carriene”, Travolta has appeared in the project he won, but he has also appeared much more, who have collected a deception than this extent Travolta now has a full seven films with straight 0% rotten tomato points.

How is he doing it? Well, the phrase “Passion Project” seems to be a judgment judge “Pulp Fiction” star. At different points, Travolta has got it on the head that, because he likes it, it makes a fantastic movie (of course with him in the lead role). My personal favorite example is the 2018 “Gotti”, “Passion Project”, which Travolta had tried to get seven years before his debut. John Gotti seemed to light something in Travolta, who promoted the film’s constantly loving hell, by joining social media for the first time ever to sing thanks. According to insiders who spoke Hollywood ReporterThe actor really believed in his performance as a mafia Don would bring the success of the Untold Awards. Instead, “Gotti” is one of the biggest mistakes in his films and one of RT seven 0 %.

But “Gotti” was not the first time that Travolta had seen the passion project explodes his face. As I said, the man just never seemed to learn certain lessons, even after the 2000s “Battlefield Earth” accident. This earlier Travolta “Passion Project” project became such a cutting failure of the earth Even the “Battlefield Earth” writer asked for apologies for the movie after the fact.

Battlefield Earth was a bad adaptation of L. Ron Hubbard

As if “trading paing” and “life on the line”, the name of Sully John Travolta was not enough, he is also a scientologist – and also quite enthusiastic. At one point, Travolta decided that he had to honor the cinema theater for the founder of this small cult of L. Ron Hubbard, and did so by adapting his 1982 novel “Battlefield Earth”. The head of scientology Honcho was also a prolific science fiction (if you can believe it) and his book about the rebellion of humanity in the tyrannical foreign breed, known as Psychlos, which apparently was interested in travolo to such an extent that he basically forced a large evidence adjustment.

Now we have already stated that John Travolta has had a very lower career in all his successes. Somehow, he even succeeded in a “Saturday night fever” -one of the most famous films of the 70s -which was so bad that Boston’s Globe Owen Gleiberman called “shame”. However, in that case Director Sylvester Stallone has taken a large part of guilt to produce such a flop. In fact, however, you can choose for almost any decade and find the Travolta stain. So, “Battlefield Earth” is one of his worst films, so it is one of the worst movies in Hollywood history.

The movie was made in a $ 73 million The budget and directed Roger Christian, a man who honored the design of science fiction films since he helped to create Lightsaber “Star Wars: Episode IV-Uus Hope” and drawn up on the appearance of Ridley Scott’s Space Horror Classic “Alien”. Still, “Battlefield Earth” is still one of the most devastating science fiction films of all time.

Not that you need an explanation outside the movie anymore, a obedient Oodi for a man who gave the world from the “gotti” of the world. Still, if you wondered what went wrong, here’s a brief explanation.

John Travolta really believed in the battlefield ground

Even in pre -production, almost everyone except John Travolta thought that “Battlefield Earth” was a bad idea. Nonetheless, the actor was eager to do it, so he not only invested his own money in the project, but also in principle forced the film production with the use of a recent company with the name of franchise images. The company’s chief Elie Samaha was particularly strong. Book “Apocalypse Visions: Destroying Eyeglasses in American Movie” Quotes to say, “I would shout everyone:” This is a science fiction, starring John Travo! “Again and again.” This approach was alleged to be attached to the negativity caused by a scientology connection, and after Samaha managed to get the film’s funding and production, she apparently just stepped back and gave Travolta and Co. Do what the hell they wanted. “

What they did was not good. Director Roger Christian once told Vice chairman That Travolta sold him in the film, referring to “Pulp Fiction” 3000 “and” Schindler’s list of “science fiction”. He also claimed that the actor watched the film “like” Star Wars, “just better”. In reality, “Battlefield Earth” was a disaster of $ 73 million, and its $ 29.7 million The global ticket revenue was the least devastating thing. The film saw Psychlos leader Travolta Play Terl, which dominates the country in 3000. Therefore, he leads humanity to fight Psychlos to restore the planet. Forest Whitaker is also there. Add all of it, and you have a movie that left critics a little more than impossible.

That is, the film was “like” Star Wars “, Roger Ebert compared the film’s experience of taking a” bus trip with someone who needed a bath for a long time “and claimed that the film was not” bad “but” unpleasant hostile “. The hostor is quite much “About 20 minutes after this amateur image, extinction does not look like such a bad idea.”

Unexpectedly despite the horrifying reviews and the fact that travisa Never really recovered after this boxage“Battlefield Earth” is not one of the actor’s 0%prestigious movies Rotten tomatoes. Not that the site you should be credible There are only two war movies It should be taken too seriously, but if you are interested, “Battlefield Earth” is a 3%rating and a 2%rating among the best critics. This means that only one of the 44 best critics liked the film and that critic was from Bob Graham San Francisco’s chronicle, whose “fresh” review was this, “Is that it should be seen once?”





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *