Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
One of the two documented immigrants with previous convictions held by Interior Safety Investigations (HSI) of American immigrants and customs (ICE), heads for a vehicle, in a parking lot from Home Depot in Tucson, Arizona, United States, January 26, 2025.
Rebecca Noble | Reuters
THE Supreme Court On Monday, the Trump administration resumes rapid deportations of certain immigrants to countries other than their own warning, and the possibility of challenging them on the grounds that they could end up being tortured or killed.
The court raised a injunction published in April by a judge of the Federal District Court in Massachusetts who blocked the practice, which was set up after a executive decree Signed by the President Donald Trump in January.
The ordinance of Monday by the Supreme Court will remain in force as a call in the case by the Trump administration.
The three liberal judges of the Supreme Court dissident of the order.
Judge Sonia Sotomayor, in her scathing written dissent, said: “I cannot join such a raw abuse of fair discretion of the Court.”
“Launch the expulsion aircraft,” tweeted assistant assistant secretary for internal security Tricia McLaughlin.
“The Scotus decision is a victory for the security and security of the American people,” wrote McLaughlin. The Biden administration has enabled millions of illegal foreigners to flood our country and now the Trump administration can exercise its undisputed power to withdraw these illegal criminal foreigners and clean this national security nightmare. “”
The leader of the legal group representing immigration in a trial led to the order, said in a press release: “The ramifications of the ordinance of the Supreme Court will be horrible; it suppresses the critical protections of the regular procedure which protected the members of our classes against torture and death.”
“However, it is important, however, the court’s decision only disputes with the power of the Court to propose these protections at this intermediate stage of the case,” said Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Alliance. “We must now move as quickly as possible to conclude the case and restore these protections.” \
Sotomayor, in his dissent, wrote: “In matters of life and death, it is preferable to be cautious”, one of these judges.
“In this case, the government has adopted the opposite approach,” wrote Sotomayor.
“This wrongly deported a applicant to Guatemala, even if an immigration judge found that he was likely to face torture there,” she wrote. “Then, in a clear violation of a court order, she expelled six others in South Sudan, a nation that the State Department considers too dangerous for everyone, except its most critical staff.”
“The timely intervention of an attentive district court just prevented a third series of illegal moves in Libya,” wrote Sotomayor.
“Rather than allowing our colleagues from the lower courts to manage this dispute to high issues with the care and attention it needs clearly, this court now intervenes to grant the government’s emergency reparation of an order which he has repeatedly concerned,” she wrote.
