The Best Disney Live-Action Remake, According To Rotten Tomatoes

In 2010 Disney scored a goal unexpectedly a big hit by Tim Burton’s “Alice in Wonderland” A movie that cost a considerable $ 200 million, but inexplicably deceived over a billion dollars worldwide. I say “inexplicably” because the film had not very much favored critics; It currently has a vague 51%approval rating Rotten tomatoes. Although it had the same title as Disney’s 1951 animated film “Alice in Wonderland”, it was more of a sequel than the latest, following Alice (Mia Wasikowsa) back to Wonderland after she had become an adult. There he noticed that Fantasy Kingdom was divided through war and violence, which led him to hand over the armor’s suit and take the sword to do things right.

Disney had renewed some of his animated films earlier (“The Jungle Book” in 1994, “101 Dalmatians” in 1996), but “Alice” directed the new studio orientation. Over the next 15 years, Disney is thinking about his own qualities with sharp aggression, biting theaters with the huge Nostalgia bait restart. Some of the films of this trend acted as re -examination of familiar characters (“Maleficent”, “Cruella”), while others were straight re -versions that went so far as to use the same songs as their predecessor (“jungle book” Beauty and the Beast “,” Little Mermaid “,” “Lion King”, “” For the most part, films have been wildly successful, even if most of the audience is creatively bankrupt.

It is important that all of these Disney reunions took elements, character design and plots of the animation features that inspire them, ensuring that the company Disney still had absolute control over these stories. In fact, the mouse house requires the control of the “default” version of certain fairy tales, even those who come from folk or literature. Re -versions of the studio’s cognitive “ownership” again.

Quality regulations are mixed at its best. Rotten tomatoes can at least point us to the movies that have been received by critics.

After this article, Jon Favreau’s 2016 film “The Jungle Book” is the best prestigious Disney-Live-Ruise with a 94%approval rating. Of course, the film is, but one of the many Rudyard Kipling’s 1894 adventure novel. But indeed, it is the latest to Wolfgang Reotherman’s animated adaptation, published in 1967. In the coup of special effects, most of the “jungle book” is animated, and speaking animal figures and most of the backgrounds are CGI. The only live action element is consistently the Mowgli played by Neel Seth. Celebrities were also expressed by animal figures, including Ben Kinglsey Bagheerana, Idris Elba Sher Khanina, Scarlett Johanssonina Kaa, King Louisina and Bill Murray Baloo.

Critics praised Favreau’s film for their visual, while it was more thoughtful and meaningful than the 1967 animated film that inspired it. New Yorker’s Anthony Lane There was one of the rare misleaders, claiming that the dazzling visuals were in the service of advanced technology and did not convey the story or humanity very well.

Favreau would use a similar approach to all comprehensive special effects when he renewed the 1994 “Lion King” in 2019. Despite being often described as a live function, the film is almost completely animated in a photorealist way (Save literally for one live action shot) and also used the same songs as their predecessors. However, the result was less received because the photorealistic lions were expressive; They looked like too much Like the right animals. In addition, “Lion King” is one of the worst prestigious films in the Disney-Remaist-Trend that sports 52%approval on Rotten Tomatoes. However, it was an even bigger hit than “Alice in Wonderland”, which made $ 1.66 billion in box office revenue. Prequel title “Mufasa: The Lion King” was published in 2024.

The second highest approval rating of Rotten Tomatoes was given to “Pete’s Dragon” in 2016, directed by David Lowery, and has an 88% rating for 244 reviews. It is also distinguished from other studio replacements because “Pete’s Dragon” is strikingly different from its predecessor, taking a more soulful, realistic approach. Next after that is Kenneth Branagh’s 2015 Redux “Cinderella” With an 84%approval rating and really bothered to form their story in interesting ways. Particularly for the wicked maternity side (Cate Blalanchett), a sympathetic background was given that made him feel a little more tragic (but not so sympathetic that he was not a villain).

The fourth place on the list is Stephen Sommers’ Live -Action 1994 application “The Jungle Book” with an 80%approval rating. However, that film, in particular, was not heard back to Disney’s 1967 animated film; It was just a new interpretation of Kipling’s original story. This takes us “Cruella”, the fifth most classified as Disney Uusimän, and the best character survey of the only Craig Gillespie guidance. The 2021 film was based on a strange idea in the sense that it sought to create a complex and myth -colored background for Cruella de Vil (Emma Stone), a woman who just wanted a bunch of Dalmatian puppies to make fur fur “100 and one Dalmatian.”

By jumping forward to the bottom of the list, we have Robert Zemeckis’s “Pinocchio”, which poured tons of money for live activities and CGI renewal to Disney’s 1940 animated film, but felt that he was unnecessary and visually busy by earning its 27%approval rating. Its evaluation is even below 1996 “a hundred and one Dalmatian” restart “101 Dalmatians,” Live-Action, starring Glenn Closella Cruella de Vil.