Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Brad Feld has spent decades to operate by a simple principle: giving without expecting anything in return. This philosophy goes beyond the traditional thought of remuneration, he says. It is a question of helping others, knowing only significant connections and opportunities to emerge organically over time if you do.
The entrepreneur and VC, who began to invest providential in the 1990s, took on importance through his Candide blog “Feld Thoughts”, which withdrew the curtain from the then secret company industry and sparked countless discussions in Silicon Valley. After decades as an investor and co-founding at the same time Techstars and the group of venture capital funds-which supported hundreds of companies over 18 years before deciding to Stop collecting new funds At the beginning of 2024 – Feld distilled his approach to business and life to his latest book, “Give the first time. “”
Techcrunch discussed Feld last week from mentoring, limits and the reason why vulnerability could be the most important leadership competence.
You have been thinking of this concept “giving first” for more than a decade. What ultimately pushed you to write the book now?
This is my ninth book, and I procured myself to be finished with the writing of non-fiction; I am interested in exploring science fiction writing. The intersection of maybe it is my last book and that I really want to capture these ideas made me sit about three years ago.
The concept appeared in 2012 in my book of “start -up communities” as a paragraph entitled “Give before you get”. The idea was that if you want a startup community to really move, you need people to be ready to put energy without defining in advance what they will recover. It is not altruism – they will get something, but they do not know when, to which, on what period, or in what form.
You were once apparently everywhere, then you pulled back. After taking a two-year break in public life, what brought you back?
I decided that I did not want to participate in anything who is oriented towards the public. I was tired and exhausted. I focused on behind -the -scenes work, which meant [my wife] Amy and I were together all the time because I was not distracted by other things. It was really satisfactory.
When David Cohen returned As CEO of Techstars a year ago, I told him that I will engage as much as he wanted, but I still didn’t want to be public. Working with him on the strategy gave me in depth. I also took the [book draft] Outside the shelf, watched it and thought: “It’s pretty good.”
This book really concerns mentorship in its different forms. You also talk about the importance of setting limits to avoid professional exhaustion. There is a reason for the adage “no good action remains unpunished”. How should mentors protect themselves while giving generously?
There are many in the book. I was very open to mental health difficulties to help destigmatize these problems. . .And there are no absolute answers to the question. A challenge when you are ready to contribute energy without being transactional is that there are people who cannot do this or who are extractors.
Adam Grant describes this spectrum in “Give and take», With donors at one end, takers of the other and merchants in the middle. Most of our world, really, are traders for takers. In the short term, takers can do very well, but in the long term, people at the end of the donor are much more successful when success is not simply measured as power and money.
You emphasize the importance of saying “I don’t know” during mentoring. Why is it so crucial?
It is extremely harmful to the new founders when they are experienced and who succeed in positioning themselves as having the answer to everything. The magic of entrepreneurship has many hypotheses, tests them quickly and learning in the event of failure.
We are in an environment where people cannot present things like hypotheses. They present them as affirmations. The vagueness between opinion and the fact is a waste. The best mentors provide data and hypotheses, not affirmations about what you need to do.
One of [my] The mentor manifesto phrases are “guide, do not control”. Sometimes you know the answer, but whoever has been a big manager knows that the best way to get the commitment is to bring people to get involved.
There is a lot of opinion that takes place behind the scenes. How should the founders sail in contradictory advice from several mentors?
When I had comments on my first project [of the book] From 25 people, I absolutely obtained contradictory information. The more mentors can comment on their own experience, the more useful it is. Instead of saying “Here is what you should do”, they should say: “Here is an experience that I had that is similar, and here is what I did.”
If the mentories listen to this way, the stroke of the mentor is not serious; You get several data points from several experiences. It is less “choose your own adventure” and more synthesizing things that make sense in your context, making a decision, communication to mentors, and then making them commit and support you.
When is someone ready to be mentor?
Here is the magic tip of mentorship: the best mentor-mentor relationships become peer relationships where mentor learns as much mentoré as mentoring learns mentor. This essentially means that anyone can be a mentor at any time.
Some of the people I learned the most are at the very beginning of their careers – people still at university, directoring their first business. My friend Rajat Bhargava was 21 years old when we started working together in 1994. The amount we learned from each other since then is unreal.
There are very successful and experienced people who are horrible mentors and people very early with little experience that are extraordinary mentors. Your ability to be effective as a mentor is not linked to your success or experience – it is a way of being.
How does this philosophy apply during time as now,, Where we see massive layoffs in technology, AI disturbances in everything. . .
Currently, there is almost no predictive power associated with everything that someone says. We are so disconnected to understand what will really happen. The very strong and extreme declarations that people make have the lowest predictive power I have ever seen.
We live in a space where it is noisy and shocking, but I hope that this kind of thing will be timeless. My goal with this book is not for people to say that I understood correctly. It is to stimulate people to think differently about certain things, or to strengthen what they already think in an additive way.
You always manage funds and assets dating from almost two decades. Final reflections on the decline in the traditional venture capital model?
Amy and I say it all the time: we will all die. We don’t know when this day is. What are you going to make your precious life? The number of people hanging on the relevance by their nails in the 1970s and 80s. . If that gives you a sense, great. But for many, the answer [to the question of whether or not to do that] is not yes.
