Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Beyoncé He is ahead of his progressive fan membrane after a strong setback as he played a controversial t -shirt during his “Cowboy Carter” tour of Paris.
The 43-year-old music image criticizes the use of the shirt, equipped with a group of Buffalo soldiers, a group of historic African-American soldiers, which served in the United States Army after the Civil War but has their role in the Indian War.
Although many originally assumed that Beyoncé’s shirt was to be emphasized with ignoring a piece of black history, critics quickly pointed out the deeper and more worrying effects.
Article continues under ad
At the end of the 19th century, Buffalo soldiers were sent to fight indigenous Americans to the west of the United States during the expansion and was with European colonizers with the brutal wars of India.
Even more shocking was the back of the Beyoncé shirt, which included indigenous peoples and others, referring to “peace, order and solution” enemies that refer to indigenous peoples and others.
According to a shared screenshot OntddFull extract read:
“Their antagonists were the enemies of peace, order and solution: the Indians, the robbers, the rabbits, the murdered weapons, the bootleggers, the offenders and the Mexican revolutionary.”
Article continues under ad
The fans quickly took the commentary to express their disappointment, and many accused the superstars of promoting harmful historical stories.
“I understand that history is complex and contradictory, but the whole grip on the back ??
The other added: “Even in this situation, I think there is a bad quote for use. It is not ok to offend indigenous peoples to celebrate the achievements of Buffalo soldiers. They could have found something different.”
“So offensive,” a third said.
Article continues under ad
Some users criticize the general defect of cultural sensitivity, as a pattern to previous disputes.
“This is the same woman who used the sound of a disaster where people died,” one commentator said. “He (or someone who works for him) apparently does his homework on topics that are important to him and ignores everything else.”
Others presented his $ 20 million proposal in Dubai earlier this year, in a country where LGBTQ+ rights are seriously limited, the latest abuse follows the model of questionable choices.
Article continues under ad
“Is it really surprising that the same woman became 20 million countries that literally illegal to be gay and then turned around and tried to make her tour a queer party?” One user asked. “He doesn’t give sh*t, he doesn’t need. His stansa are extreme and sorry for anything.”
Article continues under ad
Beyoncén Buffalo Soldiers T-shirt’s setback continued to reproduce as fans were flooded with social media criticism, accusing a pop icon deeply in the history of a painful chapter.
“Not everyone in black history has been respected and become aesthetic,” one commentator wrote, referring to the militarized role, Buffalo’s soldiers played during the Indian wars.
The second post read: “Buffalo soldiers did horrible things to the people of indigenous people. The way he wakes their atrocity into indigenous peoples is rough. Beyoncé’s romance is here on the light.”
Many fans expressed their disappointment in what they saw as a lack of thoughtful surveillance from the artist’s team.
“I love him, but I really hope to think a lot more before being given green light,” one fan wrote.
The other added, “That shirt … Ma’am, someone in your team someone should have done a triple check. It’s a deaf hell.”
For some, it was not about the withdrawal of Beyoncé; It was about keeping him responsible. As one message clearly stated, “I love his music, but he cannot be criticized, especially for selling Merch, who calls indigenous enemies to peace. As you dare?”
At the time of writing, Beyoncé has not publicly dealt with setbacks.
Article continues under ad
It or his team responds, is still visible. However, the controversy has sparked a broader debate, historical situation and the impact of celebrity in public memory design.