Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Republican legislators have proposed major changes to student loans, which would affect current and future borrowers.
The Republicans of Congress are closer to the revision of the Federal Student Loan System with budgetary legislation according to which, following the example of US President Donald Trump, they call “A great nice bill“The Republicans of the Chamber adopted their version of the bill in May, and the GOP Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions published its legislative proposals for the bill on June 10.
Both versions include major changes to student loansAmong them, a reduction in current reimbursement plans for only two options, both with longer reimbursement periods.
Experts have warned that the longer deadlines for new reimbursement plans could hang borrowers with a longer than expected education debt.
“I fear that we are increasing the population of the elderly who still have student debts,” said Betsy MayottePresident and founder of the Institute of Student loan advisers. “The longer debt can have an impact on things like buying a house, the cost of other credits and, of course, retirement.”
Existing borrowers can keep access to the income -based reimbursement plan, but anyone who borrows after July 2026 would be subject to new rules. Millions of Save borrowers could be forced to new plans at the end of the administrative abstention period.
Nothing has yet been finalized, but if the bill adopts, here is how it could affect your student loans and your long -term finances.
Find out more: If you are a student loan borrower registered to save, make this move now while your payments are on break
What are the new reimbursement plans for student loans from Republicans?
Although there are differences between the proposals of the Chamber and the Senate for the revision of student loans, the two plans describe two new reimbursement plans: a standard reimbursement plan and the reimbursement aid plan.
All student loans borrowed after July 1, 2026 are limited to these two reimbursement plan options.
1. Standard reimbursement plan
The current standard reimbursement plan extends over 10 years. The standard plan proposed would extend the reimbursement window at 10 to 25, depending on the amount of the debt:
Standard reimbursement plan levels
| Debt | Reimbursement term |
|---|---|
| Less than $ 25,000 | 10 years old |
| $ 25,000 – $ 50,000 | 15 years old |
| $ 50,000 – $ 100,000 | 20 years old |
| More than $ 100,000 | 25 years |
A longer reimbursement plan could mean more affordable monthly payments, but you would be indebted longer and that you would pay more interest overall. Consider this example of a loan of $ 40,000 with an interest rate of 6.53%.
Standard reimbursement plan costs
| Reimbursement term | Monthly payments | Total interest costs |
|---|---|---|
| Current standard plan (10 years old) | $ 455 | $ 14,576 |
| Standard plan proposed (15 years old) | $ 349 | $ 22,839 |
2. Reimbursement assistance plan
The new reimbursement assistance plan would replace all current income reimbursement plans and adjust your payments to 1% to 10% of your adjusted gross income, with a minimum payment of $ 10 per month.
You will have to pay 1% of your act if you earn between $ 10,000 and $ 20,000, 2% if you earn $ 20,000 at $ 30,000, 3% for $ 30,000 to $ 40,000, etc. Borrowers who earn less than $ 10,000 would pay $ 10 per month, and those who earn $ 100,000 or more would pay 10%.
Your loan payments are applied to interests first, then costs and finally to the principal. The rap plan includes an exemption from interest, so if your monthly payment does not cover the amount of interest that accumulates this month, unpaid interest is lifted. This could help to alleviate frustrations with former student loans reimbursement plans (with the exception of Save), which potentially allowed unpaid interest to increase the balance even when the borrowers made payments in time.
In addition, the plan offers a minimum balance reduction of $ 50 per month. So if your monthly payment is $ 100, but $ 60 go to interest and expense, you would only pay $ 40 for your main balance. The government would hinder the remaining $ 10, so you reach the $ 50 threshold.
Monthly payments would drop from $ 50 per dependence, so if you have a loan payment of $ 250 and two children, you would pay $ 150 per month on the rap plan. If you have a student loan payment of $ 100, you only have to pay the least $ 10 per month.
However, rap has a longer calendar than the current Refunds focused on income – 30 years against 20 or 25, this is how you could end up paying much more for much longer.
What can current student loan borrowers expect?
Under the proposed plan, current borrowers may have the opportunity to go to new plans or go to the income -based reimbursement plan.
Under the proposed plan, existing borrowers (loans contracted before July 1, 2026) will have access to a version of the current IBR plan, paying 15% of their discretionary income with forgiveness after 25 years or 10% with forgiveness after 20 years, depending on the moment they contracted the loan.
Millions of borrowers have registered savings on a precious education (the Backup plan) Always await a resolution after the courts have canceled the plan. The payments of borrowers are interrupted while their loans remain in a general abstention, but it is not known when payments will reddemade. However, whatever the plan in which they end up moving will likely lead to higher monthly payments and a longer reimbursement period.
Let us return to this example of a loan of $ 40,000 at an interest rate of 6.53%. Assuming that you are a unique deposit with an annual income of $ 60,000, here is what your monthly payment and reimbursement payments and RAP could look like:
Record vs new refund plans
| Reimbursement plan | Monthly payments | Reimbursement time | Total paid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Save (10%) | $ 207 | 25 years | $ 62,100 |
| IBR (borrowed before July 1, 2014) | $ 457 | 25 years | $ 137,100 |
| IBR (borrowed after July 1, 2014) | $ 304 | 20 years old | $ 72,960 |
| Proposed rap | $ 250 | 30 years | $ 90,000 |
“In terms of the provisions of the rap plan, there will be winners and losers,” said Robert FarringtonExpert in student debt and founder of the college investor. “Although the 30 -year period is longer and may make the overall costs more expensive for some, other borrowers benefit from the main interests and subsidies.”
Although your monthly loan payment can fall on rap, according to your income, the longer time could create an obstacle for your long -term financial objectives. If you get a diploma at 22, you could end up with student loan payments up to 52 years. The more, you will end up paying more interest over time.
According to a analysis By the Student Borrower Protection Center, the new rap could cost the borrower typical of $ 2,929 per year.
“This comes to a contract under contract,” said Mark KantrowitzAn expert in student loans and financial assistance. It “mainly affects borrowers who live below or near the poverty line for decades, which represents more than half of the borrowers in an income -based reimbursement plan”.
Parent more borrowers could be excluded from all income focused on income.
“The Senate updated bill makes borrowers impossible with Parent loans to access the reimbursement plans focused on affordable income if they are not already in ICR before the signature of the bill,” said Farrington.
Other modifications offered to student loans
Republican legislation offers several other Changes to student loans. Here are some of the main ones.
No option to exclude spouse’s income
As part of the new Senate proposal, rap Payments for married borrowers will be based on the income of the two spouses, even if they deposit taxes separately.
“”[The Senate bill] Reintroduces “marriage sanction” for student loans and could seriously increase their payments, “said Farrington.
Restrictions on reversal and abstention
The plans of the Chamber and the Senate seek to eliminate the postponement for economic difficulties and to reduce the period of abstention to nine months over a period of 24 months. Currently, borrowers can ask for economic difficulties for a postponement for a maximum of three years and abstention for 12 months over a period of three years.
“Historically, the Congress has never removed the advantages of existing borrowers, but the Chamber and the Senate seem to do so,” said Mayotte.
Reduced borrowing limits
The republicans of the house proposed to restrict borrowing $ 50,000 for undergraduate students, $ 100,000 for higher education programs and $ 150,000 for professional programs. They also want to cap parental loans more at $ 50,000 and eliminate GRAD plus loans. The Senate Republicans offered a higher limit of $ 200,000 for professional programs and $ 65,000 for parents’ borrowers.
These new limits can reduce access to college for some students, according to Kantrowitz.
“Loan limits can affect low or intermediate income students who are registered in high cost colleges, where the limits of the federal loan may not be enough,” he said. “They may have to count on private student loans, which may not be available.”
Mayotte also says that it is concerned about reducing loans availability.
“If the cost of tuition fees does not drop, we end up with many students who reach their eligibility for the maximum federal loan and are not eligible for private loans to finish their diploma,” said Mayotte. “Having debt and no diploma is one of the largest defect indicators in the student loan portfolio.”
Limitations of the Pell grant
Republican legislators would provide funds for Pell subsidies but would tighten the conditions of eligibility. The version of the house raises the bar of the definition of “full -time” studies – students should earn 30 credits per year to be eligible, for example, rather than the current 24.
“This particularly affects low -income students who have to hold full -time job when he was registered in college,” said Kantrowitz. “Students of community colleges will be particularly affected.”
The version of the Senate of the bill would prevent students from receiving Pell subsidies if they received enough stock market money to cover their cost of attendance.
School responsibility
The bills of the Chamber and the Senate provide that federal aid is linked to school performance, although they differ in how to measure the success of a school. The version of the room is based on the quantity of federal soldiers of loans to school students is not in reimbursement. The Senate connects the federal aid of a school to the quantity of bump that students get earnings after attending the school programs.
