5 The Big Bang Theory Characters Who Deserve Their Own Spin-Off Series

Even sitcom standards, “Big Bang Theory” is a lot of colorful characters. However, the show tends to focus firmly on Sheldon (Jim Parsons), Leonard (Johnny Galecki), Penny (Kaley Cuoco), Howard (Simon Helberg) and Raj (Kuny Nayyar). Some rise above the will: Mayim Bialikin Amy and Melissa Rauchin Bernadette were promoted to the main staff during season 4 and remained as such until the end of the exhibition. Many other characters have also enjoyed shorter notes as part of the protagonist before either leaving the exhibition completely or quietly falling back.

The abundance of these peripheral characters has left the exhibition with overwhelming fascinating characters, which not only receive the concentration they are undoubtedly addressed because they are not completely gel with the protagonists or because they simply do not fit into the present story. Fortunately, the “Big Bang Theory” Franchise has recognized this and begins to expand its universe in spin-off series.

“Young Sheldon” and “Georgie & Mandy’s first marriage” take place in the past but The upcoming spin-off will focus on Kevin Sussman’s Stuart Bloom“Stuart does not save the universe,” finally turns the unfortunate artist-bond-Comic Book shop owner. The program also means at least two other “The Big Bang Theory” characters, Stuart’s partner Deninen (Lauren Lapkus) and Professor of Caltech Geology Bert Kibbler (Brian Posehn). This is a welcome indication that there may be more on the horizon … And if you ask me, these are five “The Big Bang Theory” characters, which should be in the next line of your own spin -off.

There is only one member in the main departments who really deserves a spin-off at this stage of the spin-off, and it is Kunal Nayen’s Dr. Rajesh Koothrappali. This is no other character, take into account – the Raj only happens to be the only one whose life situation and the “Big Bang Theory” arc guarantee to continue research. He has very rich parents with whom he has a tight relationship, and a fair lawyer sister Priya (Aarti Mann). He has a cute dog. He even has an interesting career in astrophysics, which has earned him international attention, anger with Neil Degrasse Tyson, and even a scandal-like-life-like scandal-like work for these work for comedy scenes, any Sitcom worth it. In addition, he has potential.

In Commedia dell’arte terms Raj is Pierrot – a lonely, beloved, litter proverb. He is the only protagonist at the “Big Bang Theory” event without a long -term romantic arc, and eventually falls through the cracks as the exhibition progresses and its focus shifts to the nest crises of different characters. In addition, much of his story is adaptation: during the exhibition, he moves from a foreign fund child who learns American culture and struggles with his uncertainty with a (relatively) self -reliance, and even a show in the shadow of his best friend Howard. Conversion of Late Game Style.

All of this makes the limits a perfect candidate for spin-off. His entire “The Big Bang Theory” arc is practically one long origin story, and the man it is shaping him “Big Bang Theory” Final Leaves her future open.

Leonard’s incredibly successful mother, Dr. Beverly Hofstadter (Christine Baranski), is undoubtedly the undoubtedly Juli and the arrogant character of Big Bang Theory, who says something in an exhibition that also contains Sheldon Cooper. A cold, dominant psychiatrist and neuroscientist, his analytical personality, and some ironic oblivion to other people’s feelings make him a reliable editorial channel for some of the darkest laughter of the exhibition. It is admitted that he will improve as the exhibition progresses. Still, tonally, he is a discord agent who seems to be much more at home in the shop with Barbs at the crane brothers at the “Frasier” event than “Big Bang Theory” -which is, of course, a matter. As happens, it is also a key part of my field for Beverly Spin off.

Imagine Baranski, award -winning veteran exhibitions like “good wife” and “golden age”, leading to “Frasier” style, which is tailored around her character as she cuts through an analysis and an offensive celebrity field. Ideally, I see this as a slightly more dramatic exhibition than the original – “Young Sheldon” already showed that tone changes are completely possible in “Big Bang”. However, Baransk has a lot of sitcom experience (see: his 1995 primary Emmy “Cybill”), so there is no reason why the overall tone of the series could not be fuller than its central character. After all, this can be an easier way to make Leonard, Penny, Sheldon Kameoja and other “The Big Bang Theory” characters with whom she interacts with.

Wil Wheaton is not the only real -life celebrity that appears in “Big Bang Theory”, but he is by far the most visible. Wheaton appears in 17 episodes, especially by playing a miserable version of himself. After the meeting, Sheldon’s Mystic Warlords of Ka’a Tournament 3, two almost immediately develop an antagonistic relationship, and even after they do peace in season 5, the friendlier Wheaton is still the power of chaos, with its appearance tending to report absurd events and terrible misunderstandings.

Setting up an exhibition for a character who is an actor’s imaginary strange version may seem like a stretch, but it has been done with success in the past. In 2008, Action star Jean-Claude van Damme played a self-complained version at the satirical “JCVD” event and later reviewed the theme variation in the comedy drama series produced by Ridley Scott, “Jean-Claude van Johnnon.” From 2011 to 2017, Matt Leblanc hidden pearl from best sitcomThe “episodes”, “Friends” star turned into the winning performance of the Golden Earth, the aspects of his own actor’s personality with a much more realistic Joey Tribbian Lothario. Most recently, the “unbearable weight of massive abilities” of the 2022 is the study of the professional and personal struggle of fictional Nicolas Cage behind action comedy.

Although Wheaton is still highly well known, it is still best known for his Wesley Crusher role in the “Star Trek: The Next General” movie, which puts him in the Typecast box as Leblanc was before “episodes”. His “The Big Bang Theory” dating may only be happy to only turn to Stuart’s spin -off every time, but “Big Bang Theory” Weaton is more than fascinating enough to star in his own exhibition.

Sara Gilbert’s Leslie Winkle left “The Big Bang Theory” Legendally unfortunately: he was an experiment that didn’t work. Leslie, who was presented as a female response to Leonard, was one of the characters “The Big Bang Theory” with potential romantic interests, but soon became a piece that really didn’t fit into the “Big Bang Theory” puzzle and threw to make his own screen.

For me, Leslie is undoubtedly the biggest example of a character whose show is definitely wasted. Although I fully understand why the abrasive and dominant experimental physicist does not really gel with the lead – they already had both the character’s surplus – he himself is a funny character in himself, and undoubtedly does well in an exhibition that puts him on the pedestal instead of throwing him to the protagonists.

Thanks to his short season 9, we also know that time and personal growth have grinded some of the coarser edges of Leslie, which is essential for the character’s transition from a colorful part to the player. It could also provide an angle to a potential spin-off: What is a better starting point than describing what she was over the years when she was out of the screen? A show that focuses on Leslie’s still invisible exploitation “The Big Bang Theory” season 3 ahead would give viewers a chance to follow her story while The events of the senior exhibition will be displayed on the side. This starting point would not only give Gilbert’s character an opportunity to shine, but would be a fertile land for “The Big Bang Theory” for the same time.

However, a bold proposal here, given Mrs. Wolowitz’s death “The Big Bang Theory” was a major event. The character retired after his voice actor Carol Ann died in 2014, so it may seem controversial to get him back, not to mention the spin-off program. Once again, Debbie Wolowitz deserves a redemption.

In “Big Bang Theory”, Mrs. Wolowitz is an invisible character whose implicit physical dimensions in her advanced age are a common topic in body’s shameful jokes. He is also usually described as a grille and dominant. However, he is mainly a reasonable parental character that the central group has. “Young Sheldon” -style pre -part, which focuses on her, not only offers funny flashes of Howard’s childhood (which may undoubtedly be the same as her adulthood), but also to Debbie Wolowitz some deserved concentration and hopefully increase some of the unreasonable priorities.

There are two separate candidates for who (not to mention) the role. If we go to the show during Howard’s teenagers, the obvious choice would be Pamela Adlon, who already I worked with Mrs. Wolowitz’s voice “Young Sheldon”. If we take things still touching Howard’s childhood, on the other hand, I would just go ahead and throw Melissa Rauch. Although he already plays in Bernadette “Big Bang Theory”, the character’s reminder to younger Mrs. Wolowitz is mentioned several times. In addition, the emphasis on these comparisons by the fact that the same actor has both roles would be a fantastic reference to howard a somewhat unhealthy relationship with his mother. It was not exactly hurt that Rauch could reportedly make Mrs. Wolowitz’s ruthless performance.