Why Roland Emmerich’s 2012 Spin-Off TV Series Was Canceled

Hollywood loves the winner. In a landscape where some of the most marketable stories are under -tales that cross the odds, the city prefers to see Goliat as the winner over and over again. In some cases, the assumed crushing puts the cart in front of the horse, and people made by people must re -calibrate their expectations, especially when they make oversized bets on the property they believed to be a sure thing. “2012” was a very successful addition Roland Emmerich’s Disaster Movies Growing PortfolioAnd the movie was a big feather on Sony Pictures Street for 2009 – year, which can just as well be in the second universe about how a different theater environment is currently being occupied.

Emmerich -Tabbed John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Thadiwe Newton, Amanda Peet, Danny Glover, Woody Harrelson and Oliver Platt to be in Gargantuan, which are in the midst of this imaginary storm. On the heel of a comprehensive dazzling economy of the globe, the film about Apocalyps was en vogue, as it was most of the pop culture. Just ask Britney Spears What kind of US national climate was Aights’ tail head. The background of tides, tornado and other disasters that seem a bit charming Because the antagonistic power of the big budget film Emmerich weaved a decent person’s feeling of what people would do when they face a perfect and perfect accident. (Again, A large part of “2012” It feels like “Pollyanna” after living in the early 2020s and remembered what things felt at the closing of the first decade of the new millennium.)

The useful part of “2012” was the fifth highest film in 2009, taken only by “Avatar”, “Harry Potter and Half -Blood Prince”, “Ice Age: Dinosau’s Dawn” and “Transformers: Fall Revenge”. It all screams me “sure bet” to me. But for Roland Emmerich, the Big Box Office Returns seemed to be spreading from the start of the catastrophe-franchise area, but the proposed spin-off hit almost immediately, and the number of box revenue of the original movie could not be saved by it.

ABC saw the explosion of the box office and started developing a small screen of spin-off, but the gears had turned to television formation before “2012” even hit theaters. Roland Emmerich spoke to Entertainment Weekly (throughout today) Their plans on the red carpet “2012”, and it is clear that he and other producers had long been thinking about how to drive this story forward with the supposed success of the film.

As Emmerich told the socket, “The plan is that it is 2013, and it is about what happens after the disaster. It is about resettlement of the country.” He continued, “It’s very, very fascinating. [Writer/producer] Harold Kloser and I came up with the idea, and we have a luxury that we have a producer in a movie that is a big TV producer Mark Gordon. “The filmmaker then explained:

“We said to Mark, “Why don’t you make a television program that picks up where the movie goes and invite it” 2013? “ In my opinion, it focuses on people who survived, but not on boats … maybe they had been spared in the land area or as one that became a moving island of the island. There are so many opportunities they could do and I would be enthusiastic about watching it. “

All of this sounds very attractive and would have been a fun way to get to know the “2012” world on episodic television, but there was one big elephant in the room that stayed above these sublime goals, and it is a simple fact that spin-off would have been a wickedly expensive television. Entertainment Weekly report on ABC for “2012” Series It points out that the network was just the debut of the other “high concept genre” “Flashforward” and “V”, in this case, and the results were not exactly something to write home. Several factors led to the fact that “2012” did not receive a big TV debut, and the cost of the room at that time, which is a pity.

Television budgets have become a massive speech point in most entertainment stroke in 2025, many studios are actively trying to cut costs by any necessary means, and one of the easiest ways to pass all these trips layoffs is to cut some of these very expensive but louder television programs. The ABC series holds things with a slightly lower key than something like House of the Dragon, but there is no doubt that a series that looks like “2012” would be closer to what we call the “event series” than “Marvel Shield agents” is interesting a lot of hard. make television over the next decade between two programs.

There is a world where they continue the “2012” spinoff and it succeeds, but there is also a universe where everyone crashes, because the public’s consciousness does not just come true. It is all the world that would have if it should have been as far as the eye can see. Even more than a decade ago, stories have cores that can learn studios and networks, because Slam-Truk on the surface may not be worth the squeeze in the long run. But I think we’re losing some things when the decision to run a series of production is because leaders get cold feet instead of the opportunity for the public to decide what kind of project is for themselves because everyone really loves the winner.