Nuclear watchdog agency’s general director says Iran’s capabilities suffered “severe damage”

Iran’s nuclear capacities have undergone “serious damage” in last week US Airstrikes But not “total damage,” said the man in charge of the global nuclear dog dog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. “We cannot claim that everything has disappeared and that there is nothing there.”

“It is clear that there was a serious “Faced with the nation with Margaret Brennan.” “And secondly, Iran has the capacity there; industrial and technological capacities. So, if they wish, they will be able to start again.”

The United States launched three strikes on Iranian nuclear installations on June 21, after more than a week of Israeli attacks, that President Trump and the defense secretary Pete Hegseth said had “Erased” Iran’s nuclear installations.

But gross comments seemed to support an early evaluation of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), which suggested that strikes only had Return the nuclear program of Iran per month. The Trump administration criticized the evaluation of DIA as “low confidence”, and Hegseth and other officials followed the media for reporting on a “disclosed” report.

During a briefing on Thursday, journalists interviewed HegSeth several times on the question of whether Iran had moved its uranium stocks enriched before the start of Israeli and American strikes. The defense secretary replied that he “was not aware of any intelligence that I examined who says that things were not where they were supposed to be – moved or otherwise”.

Grossi said on Sunday that Iran had not shared that they intended to move enriched uranium, but at the same time “there was no physical time” for Iran to share this information.

The Director General of AIEA also admitted that he was “logical to presume that when [Iran] announce[s] That they will take protective measures “that the displacement of enriched uranium” could be part “.” But he also pointed out that “this is why it is so important, first of all, for Iran to allow our inspectors to continue their essential work as soon as possible”.

Brennan has grown gross that as it is not clear if uranium had been moved and that all centrifugal cannot be taken into account, there is an open question that Iran could always “sprint towards a bomb … if they wanted it”. Grossi said he didn’t want to be an “alarmist”, but “we must be able to check, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened”.

“Iran had a very ambitious program, and part of it can always be there, and if not, there is also the obvious truth that knowledge is there,” said Grosi. “Industrial capacity is there. Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology, as it is obvious. So you cannot disinvent this. You cannot undo the knowledge you have or the capacities you have. It is a big country, is it not? So I think it should be the incentive that we must all have to understand that military military operations or not, you are not going to resolve a definitive military way.” “”

Grossi confirmed that his IAEA inspectors had never been able to verify Iran’s claims that his nuclear program was only for peaceful purposes and that she was not trying to develop a weapon.

“We did not see a program aimed at this direction, but at the same time, they did not answer very important questions that were waiting,” said Grosi.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Saturday in a statement that there were calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of gross.

Asked about the alleged threats against nuclear inspectors, Iran’s ambassador to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravanisaid in a separate appearance on “Face The Nation” that Iran does not threaten nuclear inspectors, including gross.

Nuclear inspectors “are in Iran,” said Iravani. He said they were in “safe condition”, but “they cannot have access to our site”.

Iravani also said that since Iran has been a member of the non-proliferation treaty (TNP), nuclear enrichment is our law and an inalienable right, and we want to implement this right “.

Iravani added that he did not think that enrichment “would never stop”.