Blake Lively’s Court Victory May Be Short-Lived

Blake lively Can celebrate a big profit of the courtroom, but a legal expert urges caution.

When the judge rejected Justin Baldoni ‘A massive opposite, legal battle is anything but.

As the potential changes are waiting and a trial for 2026, the lawyer warns that this Hollywood showdown is still heating, and the profit can be transient.

In a dramatic translation on June 9, the federal judge rejected Justin Baldon’s $ 400 million protest with the Blake Lulely event, his husband Ryan Reynolds and his Publicist Leslie Sloane.

The judge also threw a claim of $ 250 million in Baldon New York Times.

However, two key arguments, violations of the implicit of the union and the embarrassing intervention can be changed by June 23.

Lively’s legal team called the decision “a complete victory and a complete justification,” and the actor himself moved to Instagram, proclaiming his “defeating” women’s rights groups.

Still in the conversation People magazine– Lawyer Gregory Doll, who is not involved, warned: “The decision is undoubtedly a blow to Baldon. But the case is far away.

Although the Lively side may seem to hold now, Doll says that much can change now between March 2026.

“There is still a lot left in the trial, including changes in the plethora,” he said PEOPLE. “As all trials know, sometimes you win everything in trial just to see your case translated in the complaint.”

Doll also stated that most of the civilian cases decide before the trial, the fate he still predicts.

“Does this affect the lever effect of the liver in reconciliation? Yes,” he said. “Will the Baldon intend to fight back, including changing his complaint to try to make a torture intervention and implicit the union’s claims? Yes.”

One claim that a baldon can check the blame for the lively and Reynolds, both WME clients, to put pressure on the agency to reject Baldon, which WME has denied.

The second relates to Baldon’s claim that Lively did not act in a sincere sense in the “it ends of us” agreement.

What a respect for respect New York TimesDoll believes that it was never expected to have succeeded. “This suit was more of a PR transfer to get their story to the audience,” he said.

Bryan Freedman, a lawyer at Baldon, shot back in a live team winning round. “The lively and his team’s predictable winning declaration is wrong,” he said in a statement on June 10.

Freedman continued: “Livel’s claims are no more truthful today than yesterday, and when we have facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence as what we had when Mrs. Lively and her group started this battle and are waiting for her upcoming deposit I will take.”

When Baldoni leaves its change, the Lasely team is likely to submit a new dismissal proposal.

However, the final judgment cannot be reached until the trial ends in 2026 or the parties will settle behind closed doors.

Judge Lewis Liman rejected Justin Baldon’s $ 400 million in protest Lively, Reynolds and New York TimesBy deciding that his statement was protected by a legal privilege.

“Wayfarer parties have not claimed that Lively is responsible for statements other than his CRD complaint,” he said after Explosion.

The judge added that there was no evidence of Reynolds, publisher Leslie Sloane or Time Worked at the defamation level.

He also stated, “It was not clear to The Times to favor the Lively version of the events.”

The appeal was completely rejected.