Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The liberals of the network divisions of the network have no objective or non -partisan vision as regards which in politics can be defined as extreme. When you are a liberal, the independent senator of Vermont, Bernie Sanders, is not extreme. It is not far from you. He gets a wave and a smile. But from their place on the political spectrum, conservative republicans are uniformly “ultra -presenter”.
In the morning after Democrats For the mayor of New York, beating the simple liberal Andrew Cuomo, The networks could not bear to define a socialist as a political problem for the Democrats. But they could describe it as charming.
Aaron Katersky of ABC proclaimed on “Good Morning America”, the voters made a “surprise choice to support a young charismatic socialist who promises to make New York more affordable, indicating that they are ready for a break from the past.”
Mamdani Rock’s political earthquake the Democrats, dividing the party on the track in advance
Journalist Rachel Scott said that Mamdani had run “very far”, but it looked like a positive: “For progressives, it is a good sign for them. They see that as their candidate who ran in a very distant program who spoke of affordability.”
The “CBS Mornings”, journalist Jerricica Duncan said that Mamdani was “a progressive Muslim immigrant” with “Savvy of social media” who led “a wave of anti-establishment feeling to a shocking victory”. It is a word of belette for an extremist: “anti-establishment”.
Co-host Vladimir Duthiers has almost approved the winning democrat: “Meet people where they are, listening to them and having solutions that, they say, speak of their future is incredibly powerful.”
On NBC “Today”, journalist Emilie Ikeda defined this candidate as simply on the left side of Cuomo: “Mamdani ran to the left of Cuomo, focusing on affordability and pushing populist ideas, including free public buses, rent gels and floors to the city’s property. Senator Bernie Sanders and representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Mamdani’s success signals an ideological change and potential generation within the party. “”
An ideological displacement to the extreme? They couldn’t say that. But they broadcast Mamdani denouncing the “fascism of Donald Trump” without any comments or correction.
Only Katersky of ABC vaguely mentioned that Mamdani “faced criticism on his anti-Israeli rhetoric. “” No one noted that he had published a rap song entitled “Salaam” in which he praised the “Holy Land Five”, which was found guilty of having channeled millions of dollars to Hamas.
Mamdani hates Israel and created his chapter on the Student for Justice campus in Palestine at the Bowdoin College in the 2010s and, as a member of State, presented a controversial bill to strip the status of non -profit organizations with links to Israeli establishments. His opponents will be a problem, even if the networks cannot manage it.
Click here for more Fox News opinion
Wednesday evening, the “PBS News Hour” shot for analysis at Errol Louis, who failed in several primary democratic campaigns for the New York municipal council. Amna Nawaz, an American Pakistani Muslim, spoke of the right -wing redoucomes and their ugliness: “Errol, we have also seen fairly ugly attacks awake in reaction to Mamdani’s victory. Which includes attacks against his faith. Charlie Kirk. He wrote: “Twenty-four years ago, a group of Muslims killed 2,753 people on September 11. Now a Muslim socialist is underway to lead New York. What does all this mean for the type of campaign you might see in advance? “Louis said:” Hatred and division do not work. “”
PBS failed to call Mamdani “Far-Left”, but a new Bill d’Agostino Newsbusters study described the PBS model. From January 21 to June 21, the network financed by taxpayers spoke three times “to the far left” and to “extreme right” 127 times – an absurd relationship of 42 to one.
Could a mayor Mamdani fail? The Chicago Tribune, What approved Joe Biden in 2020, recently directed an editorial entitled “New York, take it from Chicago-we have already seen this film, and the end is not pretty.” The newspaper wrote: “Most Mamdani’s ideas are shared (at least in principle) by the mayor Brandon Johnson, and many of them are popular in blue cities. But experience has taught us here that the candidates of the far left do not do for effective or popular municipal frameworks in the stressful economy today.”
Just as the networks are not really interested in the way Brandon Johnson occurs in Chicago, no one should expect them to criticize Zohran Mamdani. Democratic mayors run deep blue cities in the ground for 50 years or more, and no one to these networks will no longer hold them responsible, more than democratic voters. They save this conversation of “responsibility” for the Republicans.
