Clint Eastwood Rejected The Best War Movie Ever For A Surprising (But Fair) Reason

The film business has spread to the attractive what-if. What if James Cameron had made “Spider-Man?” What if CBS hadn’t used the “Magnum PI” option in Tom Selleck and let Steven Spielberg get his first choice for Indiana Jones’s role “The Lost Ark’s Raiders?” What if Sylvester Stallone had played Axel Foley “Beverly Hills Cop?”

We have no idea if these alternative timeline chances would be better than what we got, but it is fun to think about what could have been. These questions also remind us of how volatile studio projects can be. There is a huge part of every creative effort. You might think And you decide the “hook”. There are no guarantees.

Nobody knows this better than Clint Eastwood. The pioneering “dollar trilogy” and “Dirty Harry” star has invested heavily on seemingly certain things just to look at the dice of the coming snake in the eyes. In 1984, he was paired with superstar Burt Reynolds for the season’s COP comedy “City Heat”, but the film played cricket in theaters and crushing critics. Six years later he started with Hot Young Star Charlie Sheen Upper the-top between “The Rookie” And wounded by undoubtedly making the worst movie of his career.

It is clear that Eastwood should have said “no” for these two projects. But what about a time when he had the opportunity to make a massive war movie that some people think is the biggest movie of all time, a full stop?

In the 2015 interview With Stephen Galloway, Eastwood was asked about a time when he rejected “Apokalepse Now”. Eastwood was already at the age of 40, when director Francis Ford Coppola approached him to play, believe or not, Captain Willard, a part that eventually went to Martin Sheen. I don’t see it at all, but there were currently no suspicions of Coppola’s creative instincts. After all, the man was coming “godfather”, “conversation” and “godfather part II”.

Eastwood didn’t see it either. As he told Galloway “[I] Said ‘Gee, I don’t know, I don’t understand this program too much. I read the “heart of darkness” when I was young, and so I knew where it was going, but then I said, “No, I don’t think I can go for so long.” “Coppola was about to go in the Philippines for 16 weeks, but the main photo lasted 238 days. Imagine the director who is famous for making movies and schedule and budgeting for budgets.

Amazingly, Eastwood also had to translate Steve McQueen, who wanted to play Kurtz. According to Eastwood, “I said,” Well, why do you want to play it? “He says” well, I get the same money, but I only have to work for two weeks. “” Eastwood agreed that this was a lot to McQueen before it rejected the part the second time. Is it possible that Eastwood would have given the best presentation of his career “APOKYPSE Now?” Completely. However, I think it is possible that he would have killed Coppola, which means we never got Misunderstood masterpiece “one from the heart” (Even if this would have saved us “Jack” horror).