Defense For The Win? Closing Arguments Get Heated

The seventh week of federal criminal proceedings Sean “Diddy” Combs On Friday, June 27, last week, the court heard the prosecution and the end of the 55-year-old defense group. In addition, the prosecution doubled their claims that Diddy organized a criminal company through business. In addition, they reminded the jury of how Diddy claimed to have used threats, forced and exploitation to implement the alleged prostitution and gender trade. Diddy’s defense team, for its part, shot back these requirements. They claimed that the greed of witnesses was exaggerated and feeded against Diddy. In addition, they claimed that the mogul is guilty of the non-so-nice person who participated in the Swinger lifestyle.

Now that everything has been said and done, the jury is considering the allegations of both parties. Will Diddy walk away from a free man? Or is he viewed at the time behind the bar?

The shadow’s room ‘s Justin Carter reflects everythingTSR is examining. ‘

What happened during week 7 of the Diddy trial?

According to Carter, the prosecutor did not hesitate to tell the alleged events that took place during the Cassie’s romance with Diddy – for the March 2016 hotel attack to the alleged $ 100,000, which was paid to hide the safety material. In addition, the prosecutors played a Diddy voice who directed her former partner, a woman known only as “Jane Doe”, to get her “work” to facilitate her alleged drug burning freak. In addition, the prosecutors claimed that Diddy even forced Jane to “wild” evenings by threatening to withhold $ 10,000 to pay the agreed rent.

For the defense, Marc Agnifilo accused prosecutors of Diddy’s alignment and even questioned the validity of the Racket of him against him. According to Carter, he called the “fragment” for “the prosecutor’s imagination”, claiming that the trial against Diddy does not apply to crimes, but money. In addition, they claimed that the man’s escorters who participated in the freaks were so happy to make the fee for lush payments.

What is the judgment?

Ultimately, the prosecutor had the last word with them repeal the end of the defense. Towards Carter, they emphasized that the defense only sought to “disturb the Kambi’s unforgivable behavior”. In addition, they stated that the trial only showed how “no” was never an option “in his world. Now the 12 jury – eight men and four women – decide on Diddy’s fate. Does he walk for free or spend decades behind the bar?

Related: Kroger and other companies arouse setback through summer photos via Flubs | TSR is examining