Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Describing Israel and Iran fighting each other during his NATO pre-summit press conference in The Hague this week, US President Donald Trump brought an analogy with children who fight in a courtyard, who finally had to be separated.
“Papa must sometimes use strong language,” rang Mark Rutte, secretary general of NATO.
Asked about the comment after the summit, Trump said: “No, he loves me. I think he loves me. If he won’t make it, I will let you know. I will come back and hit him hard, ok? He did it very affectionately. Hey dad. You are my dad.”
The White House decided that Rutte Flatte the American president and made a troop of Trump in the Netherlands, put in the music of Usher Hey Daddy.
The Flatterie de Rutte de Trump did not stop there. By attacking the Russian-Ukraine war, Rutte told journalists before the NATO summit: “When he came to the office, he started dialogue with President Putin, and I always thought it was crucial. And there is only one leader who could break the dead end, and it was the American president, because he is the most powerful leader in the world. ”
But how are the declarations of the world leaders sincere on Donald Trump? Do they really serve to improve bilateral relations and work flattery?
Who managed Trump well and what were the results?
Neither Rutte, nor any other European leader, have engaged in any type of dialogue with Russian President Vladimir Putin for a long time after the summer of 2022, the year of his invasion of Ukraine, believing that this has useless.
The German Chancellor Olaf Scholz was seriously criticized as a “defeatist” for having called Putin last November, while the Viktor Orban of Hungary and Slovakia, Robert Fico, the only European leaders to have visited the Kremlin during the war, were considered as an openly collaborationist.
However, when Trump started talks with Putin, many Europeans paid him the same compliment as Rutte when they made their inaugural visits to the White House after entering in January.
Keir Starmer, United Kingdom
“Thank you for changing the conversation to bring the possibility that we can now have a peace agreement, and we will work with you,” said the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Keir Starmer, in the oval office in February.
Starmer released a few hats rabbits. Knowing Trump’s tenderness for the notion of hereditary power, he drew from his jacket a letter from King Charles III containing an invitation to an unprecedented second state visit to the castle of Windsor.
Trump was temporarily speechless. “Your country is a fantastic country, and it will be our honor to be there, thank you,” said Trump when he gathered.
Starmer and Trump exchanged a few handles by talking and Starmer touched Trump’s shoulder several times as a sign of affection.
But did all this flattery have a lot of effect? Trump announced that he was freeze Military aid to Ukraine the following month, to the Grand Outrage of the United Kingdom, with the Nordic and Baltic countries.
Giorgia Meloni, Italy
Starmer and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni identified Ukraine as a key problem for Trump, who clearly indicated that he wanted to win the Nobel Peace Prize by putting an end to international conflicts. So far, he has claimed the credit to have finished this month “12 -day warBetween Israel and Iran, preventing nuclear war after the air battle on May 7 India and Pakistanand supervising a peace agreement Between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda.
Meloni therefore tried an equally flattering approach to Trump. “Together, we defended the freedom of Ukraine. Together, we can build a just and lasting peace. We support your efforts, Donald,” she said during his visit to the White House in April.
Meloni cleverly struck all Trump’s hot button problems in its opening remarks, saying Italy had policies to fight fentanyl, addictive analysis that Trump blamed Canada and Mexico for having enabled the campaign, investing $ 10 billion in the American economy and controlling undocumented immigration.
She even adapted Trump’s slogan, Make America Great again, to Europe. “The objective for me is to make the west again large. I think we can do it together,” Meloni told a radiant Trump.
None of this has resulted in a Trump state visit to Rome, a decision that would cement Meloni’s position as a major European leader, however.
Mark Carney, Canada
Meanwhile, the newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney was both flattering and closed with Trump last month. He complimented Trump to be a “transformational president” who had taken the side of “the American worker”, but also closed Trump’s territorial ambition to annex Canada as a 51st American state. “It’s not for sale, I will never be for sale,” said Mark Carney.
Relations seemed to have taken a tour for the best after Trump’s friction with Carney’s predecessor, Justin Trudeau. Trump called it “very dishonest and weak” at the 2018 G7 summit in Canada before storm early.
But Carney may not have had much effect. Trump ended trade negotiations with Canada on Friday and threatened to impose additional prices on exports on new Digital services tax.
What meetings went less well?
Emmanuel Macron, France
There was little warmth at Trump’s White House meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron in February.
Under the confrontation with a leader who claims to direct Europe in strategic thought, Trump spoke of long defensive and scripted remarks that have tried to justify his Ukrainian policy.
Macron has preached that peace in Ukraine should not mean surrender – a feeling shared by many European leaders, but not expressed in Trump. Trump was cordial with Macron, but not affectionate.
Meanwhile, France holds all kinds of capitulation in Trump in the European Union’s commercial negotiations. Other EU members wish to settle for an “asymmetrical” trade agreement that could benefit the United States more than the EU, just to do so.
In addition, after the G7 meeting in Canada two weeks ago, it was clear that no love was lost between the two leaders: Trump called Macron “Advertising seeksIn an article on social networks on June 17.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Ukraine
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was mutilated by Trump and vice-president JD Vance on February 28, when he went to the White House to sign a mineral rights agreement which he hoped to bring us military aid.
He and Vance clashed for direct talks with Russia on the head of Ukraine, and Vance rocket Zelenskyy for not having shown enough “gratitude” in the United States.
“You are playing with millions of people. You play with the Second World War,” said Trump.
However, Zelenskyy and Trump seemed to have repaired a little things when they held a impromptu While attending the funeral of Pope Francis in the Vatican in April. A White House spokesperson described the meeting as “very productive”.
Cyril Ramaphosa, South Africa
Last month, Trump embusing South African President Cyril Ramaphosa at the White House when he played a video of a rally from the South African opposition party in favor of the evolution of white farmers. Trump accused South Africa of having “genocide” against white farmers.
Ramaphosa was visibly discouraged, but he patiently explained that in the context of a parliamentary system, different points of view are expressed, which do not represent government policy and that South Africa is a violent country where most victims of violence are black.
“You are a partner in South Africa and as a partner, you raise concerns that we are ready to tell you about,” said Ramaphosa, soothing Trump a little.
Trump was diverted to talk about a junior jet that Qatar had offered him during his Middle East tour. “I’m sorry I don’t have a plane to give you,” Said RamaphosaAs if to make a virtue of his lack of flattery.
Does Flatterie work with Trump?
Some experts believe that flattery can help prevent confrontation with Trump. Some observers have argued that it helps “contain the impulses of the American president”.
But Flattery does not do much to change real American policy. Rotte and other NATO leaders have failed to bring the United States back to the contact group by helping Ukraine with weapons.
“A summit devoted to the sole purpose of making Trump feels well is a very limited objective. All he does is to advance difficult decisions for another day,” wrote Andrew Gawthorpe, speaker in history and international studies at the University of Leiden, the Netherlands, in conversation, a publication in the United Kingdom.
Those who have good relations with Trump do not necessarily leave with the things they want either. Starmer American commercial deal Maintains the prices in place so that British companies exported to the United States, although weaker than Trump threatened. Meloni is still waiting for Trump to visit him.
The respectful firmness, on the other hand, seems to work.
Trump abandoned his campaign to redraw American borders by absorbing Canada and Greenland, which belongs to Denmark. Carney’s firmness helped because it had a feeling of purpose. Carney had just won an election and Trump recognized: “It was probably one of the greatest feedback in the history of politics. Maybe even more than mine. “
Denmark was also firm. Prime Minister Put Frederiksen said that existing agreements with the United States already enabled him to park military bases there, while the Greenlanders did not want to be colonized by Americans.
Trump’s attempts to embarrass Zelenskyy and Ramaphosa also retaliated. Europe has intervened to compensate for the shortfall of American military aid in Ukraine, throwing the United States as a flying line. Trump’s “white genocide” video did not make great asylum To a number of them have been strongly criticized in the United States.
