OpenAI appeals court order forcing it to preserve all ChatGPT data

OPENAI has invoked A court decision From last month, this forced him to keep Chatppt data indefinitely as part of a Case of copyright violation brought back by The New York Times In 2023. CEO Sam Altman declared in a tweet on X that the judge’s decision “compromises the privacy of our users” and “established a bad previous”.

In May, the federal judge Ona T. Wang ordered OpenAI to preserve and separate all the chatgpt journal data which would otherwise be deleted due to a request from the user. She said the decision was justified because the volume of deleted conversations is “significant”. The directive notes that the judge asked OpenAI if there was a way to anonymize data to respond to user confidentiality problems.

The New York Times Asked the order so that he can precisely follow the frequency to which Openai violates his IP, including cases where users asked for the deletion of cats. A federal judge authorized the initial case to continue, agree with the NOWargument that opens and MicrosoftTechnology had prompted users to plague its materials.

In a Faq On its site, Openai painted the order as a confidentiality problem without addressing the millions of alleged copyright violations. “This is fundamentally in conflict with the confidentiality commitments that we have taken towards our users,” wrote the company. “He abandons long -standing confidentiality standards and weakens the protection of privacy.” OPENAI noted that the command “has no impact on Chatgpt Enterprise or Chatgpt Edu” customers.

THE NOW And other Copyrights of AI is still in progress, because the courts have not yet decided if Openai, Google and other companies have broken copyrights on a large scale by scraping the Internet equipment. Technological companies have argued that training is protected by the copyright law “for fair use” and that prosecution threatens the AI ​​industry. The creators of this content, in turn, argue that AI harms their own livelihoods by stealing and reproducing works with little or no compensation.