Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
It looks like a 21st century horror film at the start of a horror film: your navigator story has always been public, and you had no idea. This is essentially what is right now on the new autonomous Meta you have an applicationWhere expanses of people publish their ostensibly private conversations with the chatbot.
When you ask a question at AI, you have the option of pressing a sharing button, which then directs you to a screen showing an overview of the publication, which you can then publish. But some users seem perfectly ignorant that they publicly share these text conversations, these audio clips and these images with the world.
When I woke up this morning, I did not expect to hear an audio recording of a man in southern accent asking: “Hey Meta, why do some pets stink more than other farts?”
Requests related to flatulence is the least META problems. On the Meta AI application, I saw people ask for help for tax evasion, if their family members were arrested for their proximity to white collar crimes, or how to write a character benchmark letter for an employee faced with legal problems, with the first and name name of this person included. Others, like the security expert Rachel Tobac, Examples found Domestic addresses of people and details of the sensitive court, among other private information.
When reached by Techcrunch, a Meta spokesperson did not comment on the file.
Whether you admit a crime or having a strange rash is a nightmare of confidentiality. Meta does not indicate to users what are their confidentiality parameters as they publish or where they even publish. So, if you connect to Meta AI with Instagram, and your Instagram account is public, your research is also on how to meet “big women of loot”.
Much of this could have been avoided if Meta did not send an application with the idea of crazy that people would like to see the conversations of the other with Meta Ai, or if someone at Meta could have predicted that this type of functionality would be problematic. There is a reason why Google has never tried to transform its search engine into social media flow – or why AOL Publishing pseudonymized user research In 2006, he went so bad. It is a recipe for disaster.
According to Appfigures, an APP intelligence company, the META AI application has only been downloaded 6.5 million times since it made its debut on April 29.
This could be impressive for an independent application, but we are not talking about a first developer who makes a niche game. It is one of the richest companies in the world sharing an application with the technology in which he has invested billions of dollars.
As each second goes, these apparently harmless requests on the Meta AI application are closer to a viral mess. In a few hours, more and more messages appeared on the application which indicate a clear -residency fishing, like someone sharing their curriculum vitae and requesting cybersecurity work, or an account with a Pepe frog avatar to ask how to make a bang of water bottle.
If Meta wanted to bring people to really use its Meta AI application, then the embarrassment of the public is certainly a way to attract attention.
