Those Creatine Gummies You Bought Online Might Not Contain Any Creatine

However, after Wired sent details on Shabanov on how deleted has carried out his tests, he conceded that there was possible that there were quality control problems with certain products and said that the company is launching an internal investigation and had already made the decision to go to another manufacturer for certain products. “There is always a non-zero chance that the manufacturers have screwed up,” he says. “The worst case, we will have to take out the whole lot of Amazon.”

According to Amazon spokesperson Juliana Karber, the company requires that the sellers of food supplements subject third-party test results to prove that they contain the ingredients of the label and are free from harmful contaminants. For the four products that have failed the deletion test, she says that “three have valid test reports verifying their compliance with relevant standards and that they contain the announced quantity of creatine.” She noted that Amazon was going to do his own product test. “Our teams are investigating the product remaining in question, and if we conclude that it does not respect Amazon’s policies, it will be deleted from the store,” Karber said in a statement. Amazon refused to share which supplements had not offered a valid test report.

The creation of effective eraser supplements is a difficult task because it requires uniformly distributing the ingredients active in individual gelatin candies. According to Shabanov, Ecowise spent months refining his processes because it was so difficult to create a product that had the appropriate quantity of creatine and also had a good taste.

In addition, because most methods of creating gummies involve heat, active ingredients can be damaged in the process. “Since creatine gammies are often like other gammies, requiring humidity and heat to produce and have citric acids lowering the pH of gum, creatine can deteriorate faster than it would have just manufactured like a dry and non -tasty powder,” explains Kamal Patel, co -founder of the nutrient database and supplements on nutrients and supplements on nutrients and supplements Examine.com. Patel describes the task of making a good creatine gum as “much more difficult” than formulating a powdered product.

Dol also had creatinine levels tested for creatinine levels, a waste created when creatine breaks down. All the gums that contained creatine also contained high quantities of creatinine, indicating that some of the active ingredients had been degraded. When the laboratory has tested popular creatine products, none had this problem.

The delete test was not the first attempt to assess the power of creatine ranges. In fact, testing competing marks of gummies has become a kind of tradition in the world of supplements. Last year, the manufacturer of supplements now food tested A dozen popular creatine brands and have reported almost dismal results to the removal results – 5 of the 12 samples failed, showing very little or no active ingredients. Earlier this year, Fitness Influencer James Smith sent a sample of gumies from a company called Ovrload in which he had already tried to invest for tests. (Smith claims that the investment offer dropped, after which the company would have continued to use its image to promote the brand.) He posted A YouTube video retail the failed results. Another company of British supplements conduit a similar third party test and also found that Ovrload gummies failed, leading the company to dirty break. (Ovrload has not responded to requests for comments, but the founder recently published on Instagram that he plans to resume sales, and add a transparency portal where users can see exactly what there is in gummies).