Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

A year after wildfires destroyed his home and upended his life, Spencer Pratt channels anger into ambition.
The reality TV star shocked viewers by announcing her candidacy for Los Angeles mayor, presenting the campaign as a responsibility rather than a celebrity.
What began as protest rhetoric morphed into a political endeavor born of loss, outrage, and a refusal to remain silent.
Article continues below advertisement
The 42-year-old announced his candidacy while attending the “They Let Us Burn!” » protest in Pacific Palisades, the same area where wildfires destroyed the home he shared with his wife Heidi Montag.
“The Los Angeles system is not in trouble, it is fundamentally broken. It is a machine designed to protect the people at the top and the friends with whom they trade favors while the rest of us drown in toxic smoke and ash,” Pratt said. Daily Mail. “The status quo is a death sentence for Los Angeles, and I’m tired of waiting for someone to actually take action.”
He then added, “This is why I’m running for mayor. And let me be clear, this is not a campaign, this is a mission, and we are going to expose the system.”
Article continues below advertisement

Spencer Pratt presented the wildfires not as a tragedy but as evidence of systemic failure, arguing that the damage was preventable and ignored.
He said: “They intentionally let us burn before, during and after. There was no responsibility. It was gross negligence. They let this happen.”
Pratt continued, “This wasn’t a natural disaster or something inevitable. It was their fault, and we need the accountability we deserve.”
He has not revealed which political party he plans to represent, leaving questions about how far this mission-driven campaign could go in a city hungry for answers.
Article continues below advertisement

In October 2025, he filed a lawsuit against the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, arguing that systemic failures made the disaster worse.
Although authorities arrested a suspected arsonist, Pratt insisted the scale and impact of the fire was the result of negligence and not inevitability.
Pratt and his wife, Heidi Montag, filed a lawsuit earlier this year with other affected residents, accusing the city of failing to maintain an adequate water system to fight the fire.
While the couple and their two sons escaped unharmed, the neighborhood was largely wiped out and lives were lost.
Article continues below advertisement
Pratt has since broadened his criticism to include California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, saying delayed action allowed the fire to get out of control.
Confident in the legal process, Pratt repeatedly said the case would be decided in favor of those who lost their homes.
He also used his social media presence to keep public attention on the trial, framing it as a fight for accountability rather than a personal vendetta.
Article continues below advertisement

Speaking openly about the emotional toll of the wildfire, Pratt told the Daily Mail that the arrest of the alleged arsonist does not absolve state leaders of their responsibility.
He argued that authorities failed to properly contain the fire once it started, allowing it to reignite and spread further.
“They let a fire smolder for a week without doing anything to mitigate it,” he said, stressing that the tragedy could have been limited by quicker intervention.
Pratt traveled to Washington, D.C., in August 2025 to meet with Attorney General Pam Bondi and other federal officials.
During those discussions, he raised concerns about wildfire preparedness and questioned plans to build public housing in the affluent Palisades area without first addressing infrastructure weaknesses.
As his public profile in the case grew, Pratt was labeled a political activist, a title he strongly rejected.
“I’m not a political activist. My house burned down. My father’s house burned down. Twelve people died. This should never have happened and I want justice,” he said.
Article continues below advertisement

Spencer Pratt and Heidi Montag were joined in the lawsuit by about two dozen other property owners who claim the city delayed repairs to the Santa Ynez Reservoir, leaving it empty for nearly a year before the fire broke out on Jan. 7, 2025.
According to the plaintiffs, this failure significantly limited firefighting efforts when they were most needed.
The lawsuit has drawn both support and criticism. Many fans rallied behind the couple, sending donations and messages of encouragement.
Others, however, were much less sympathetic. On a pop culture subreddit, some commenters argued that the couple should not take legal action after receiving financial assistance, while others questioned whether they deserved public sympathy.
Despite the backlash, there was also widespread support for the idea of holding those responsible accountable.
Some commentators have argued that all residents affected by the wildfires should sue the government, seeing this lawsuit as a necessary step toward reform.