Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Bad bunny is facing intense backlash after a museum moment sparked outrage in social media and cultural circles.
What began as a seemingly informal visit during a tour stop quickly escalated into a controversy involving ancient history, public accountability and celebrity privilege.
The incident has reignited debates about respect for cultural heritage and whether global stars are held to the same standards as everyone else.
Article continues below advertisement
#INAHInformation i ️ The National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH) informs of the circulation on social networks of images linked to the visit of the singer Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, known as Bad Bunny, to the National Museum of Anthropology (MNA).
– Inah (@inahmx) December 27, 2025
While wrapping up his Debí Tirar Más Fotos world tour, Bad Bunny stopped at the National Institute of Anthropology and History in Mexico City on December 17.
During the visit, the 31-year-old superstar shared a photo of himself placing his hand on what appeared to be an ancient Mayan stone slab, an image that immediately alarmed museum officials and historians.
The artifact in question is believed to date between 250 and 900 AD and features carved portraits of rulers as well as intricate hieroglyphic texts. These monuments historically marked dynastic milestones, political authority, religious ceremonies and the passage of time in public spaces.
For many observers, touching the stone crossed a clear line between admiration and violation.
Article continues below advertisement
Shortly after the image surfaced, the National Institute of Anthropology and History issued a public warning about declaring“As the public knows, physical contact with archaeological properties is prohibited. »
The recall highlights long-standing museum rules designed to protect irreplaceable objects from damage by oils, dirt, acids and even breathing.
Article continues below advertisement

Museums around the world strictly prohibit physical contact with artifacts, not out of formality, but out of necessity. Even brief contact can cause irreversible deterioration, discoloration or corrosion over time.
In Mexico, these protections are reinforced by law. Under the Federal Monuments Act, touching, damaging or removing archaeological objects can result in fines or even imprisonment.
In its message, INAH specified that security agents intervened almost immediately after observing the contact.
The institution explained: “Museum security personnel warned the artist that it was not allowed to touch the archaeological pieces; after the instruction, the musician immediately removed his hand from the artwork. »
Article continues below advertisement
Officials stressed that Mexico’s cultural heritage belongs to everyone and must be treated with care and respect by all visitors, regardless of their status or fame.
The message was clear: celebrity does not grant exceptions to the rules of preservation.
Article continues below advertisement

The online backlash was swift and merciless. Critics flooded social media, accusing the artist of arrogance and entitlement.
According to the Daily Mailone X user wrote: “I obviously thought the rules didn’t apply to him because he’s famous, the superiority is sickening, they don’t know how to be humble.”
Another commenter questioned this behavior more directly, writing, “What privilege does he have to touch artifacts? Fucking a**hole.”
A third added fuel to the fire with the remark: “This bastard thinks he’s a hotshot and touches stuff like it’s no big deal. Even going to a museum doesn’t rid him of his nerdy ways.”
As criticism intensified, the image was quietly removed from Bad Bunny’s social media accounts.
The museum incident did not occur in isolation. A few days earlier, Bad Bunny suffered a painful fall on stage during a concert at the 65,000-seat GNP Seguros stadium in Mexico City. While performing his song “Efecto”, he slipped while crossing the stage and fell backwards, landing hard before remaining seated for several seconds.
Pictures shared on showed the crowd chanting as he gathered and got back up, turning an awkward moment into a shared experience with fans.
Still, this incident added to a growing list of headline-grabbing moments during the latter part of the tour.
Beyond the live performances, controversy also followed Bad Bunny’s upcoming Super Bowl halftime appearance.
Article continues below advertisement
This booking sparked debate due to his anti-Trump political stance and the fact that he performs almost exclusively in Spanish.

After the halftime show was announced in late September, former U.S. President Donald Trump publicly criticized the decision, calling it “ridiculous” and “crazy.”
Political tension was further heightened when Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told YouTuber Benny Johnson that ICE would be “all over” the football game to “enforce the law.” The furor further intensified when footage went viral showing Bad Bunny remaining seated during a performance of God Bless America at a New York Yankees game while surrounding fans stood.
For supporters, it was a quiet statement of personal expression. For critics, it has become another flashpoint in an already polarized cultural debate.
Article continues below advertisement
Taken together, the museum incident, the stage crash, and the political backlash placed Bad Bunny in an unusually harsh spotlight.
Although his influence as a global music icon remains undeniable, the controversy in Mexico City reminded audiences that cultural heritage carries weight beyond social media.
In a world increasingly sensitive to history and preservation, even a simple touch can leave a lasting mark.